Hopefully, you have not been “vaccinated”, but if you have, here are links to the different pharma companies to help you find out if the batch your shot(s) came from are linked with the most adverse events.
Researcher and computer analyst Craig Paardekooper found vaccine adverse event reports vary widely by batch number. And he created a batch lookup site.
**[“Batch-code” = “Lot Number” = the number they write on your vaccination card.]
Check out your batch code (lot number): (source here or here)
- Moderna Batch Codes
- Pfizer Batch Codes
- Janssen Batch Codes
- Moderna (outside of USA)
- Pfizer (outside of USA)
- Janssen (outside of USA)
Latest Info on Boosters
(Caveat: I present this so you can do your own research and come to your own conclusions).
Craig Paardekooper, a scientist at at Kingston University, London, analyzed massive amounts of data from the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) that tracks reports by the public of vaccine injuries and deaths linked to Moderna, Pfizer and Janssen/J&J Covid vaccines. He, along with other analysts and noted scientists, state that the three companies are intentionally using differing formulas, instead of uniform formulas, as they have falsely presented to the public. (source)
Vaccines that are distributed across all states and show patterns in number of injuries suggest that that the cause of the reactions is not the demographics or personal health of the recipient, but is the vaccine.
Paardekooper shows what appears to be a calculated batch toxicity coding system in 1 minute from 4:30- 5:30.
80% of the batches produced only a handful of early adverse reaction reports. So the vast majority of the batches seem harmless.
But that remains to be seen with delayed autoimmunity, delayed cancer rates, shortened lifespan from myocarditis, future infertility and menstrual abnormalities, etc.
1 in 200 (0.5%) of the batches was found to be between 1000 and 5000 times more toxic than the average batch, and accounted for 70% of all of the adverse reactions, and 70% of all of the deaths.
1 in 20 (5%) of the batches accounted for 90% of the adverse reactions and deaths.
Here, Craig Paardekooper reveals more detail. To get right to the point, watch from 3:25 – 4:30. The rest is somewhat repetitive.
Paardekooper remarks, “It’s common practice for scientists to carefully label their vials and test-tubes, especially in an experiment. Vials are not labelled randomly, but rather denote specific experimental conditions. In this way, they can tell which medical treatment was applied to which person.
“Perhaps this was their slip up – their inevitable mistake.
“Looking at the VAERS Data: I just looked through the first 5000 batches and EVERY SINGLE ONE of the alpha-numeric codes with very high toxicity ended in either 20A or 21A.“
“There is a striking change in batch numbers for the Moderna deployment once toxicity exceeds 1780 x. The batch number changes to ending with 20A. Below this range, almost all the batches in the toxicity range of 100-1780 x have batch numbers ending with 21A.”
If Paardekooper’s VAERS findings are true, one could ask:
- Why are companies hiding this batch toxicity coding system from us?
- Why is no state or federal leader talking about this? Why are the FBI and FDA not investigating it?
- Can you be sure your vaccine vial is part of a batch listed in the VAERS database? After all, government contracts forbid vaccine vials to be marked with serial numbers.
Paardekooper says:
“Now that we have “cracked” their batch code system, it is probable that they will cease using it. However, for historical use it tells a story that is consistent in its maleficence. I would expect a mass recall to follow – and a relabeling with different batch codes – less decipherable.”
The Super-toxic, Exposed By Batch Number:
Dr. Jane Ruby shows visuals of the most deadly batches (lot numbers) for children (the EW lot), adults and the super-toxic ones (the J, K, L, and M).
These lots are already in circulation.
12 minutes. Turn down the sound initially or be blasted.
Paardekooper’s app ‘How Bad Is My Batch?’ can be shared with doctors and nurses so that they may check toxicity levels of certain batches before they inject people, especially children.
The big question now..
If there is such high variation in the toxicity of the batches, should we be mandating this medical intervention?
Should we be coercing people under threat of losing their job or being confined at home, into taking something where death or disability is a possible adverse reaction?
***For the FULL PROTOCOL (including NAC) to protect from transmission from the “V” and to help those who took the “V”, go here.
“Put an end to the evil of the wicked, but establish the righteous, O righteous God who searches hearts and minds.“ ~Psalm 7:9
We have a HUGE, exciting announcement. Deep Roots At Home now has a PODCAST! We are doing this on a trial period to see if this interests our audience. So head over today and like, share and download the first few episodes! https://buff.ly/3KmTZZd
I am only on FB now by the grace of God… if you want to stay connected, here is one way…
You can also find me on Instagram and Telegram.
Top Posts Some DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE:
- Dr. Mercola: Nebulized Peroxide, the Single Most Effective Early Strategy
- Frontline Nurse Nicole Sirotek’s Testimony On the Abuse Of Patients
- Homeopathic Protocol for Smallpox Infection, Both Curative & Preventative
- Shockingly, Studies Show Ivermectin Is A Safe, Potent Cancer Fighter
- Find a Doctor Who Will Prescribe Ivermectin & Early Covid Treatment
Jacque’s Update: Facebook and social media platforms are cracking down on Conservative/holistic health content. Many of you have complained that you never see our content in your news feeds on social media. There’s only one way to fight back — and that’s by joining my FREE newsletter. Click here.
©2023 Deep Roots at Home • All Rights Reserved
Related